1954 World Series |
Besides being fun to play and great to watch, real fans know
there are two distinct philosophies that
separate baseball from other sports. The
first is “the book”. You can’t really
define “the book” but in your gut, you know what is right and what is
wrong. If you are around the game for
any length of time you will hear someone talk about “playing by the book” and
what they really mean is they are doing things that have been commonly accepted
and therefore their decisions would not be questioned by others even if they
don’t work. Many teams and managers have
been quite successful over time, by playing by the book. Their decisions are sound because they are
based on their own experiences and those around them. They make decisions with their gut. Many of our schools function in the same
exact way….we do things because we have, over time, been successful and gained
experience that allows us to make decisions because “we know best.” However, there are times when our gut feeling
or doing something the way it has always been done does not produce the best
results. For baseball traditionalists,
this can be hard to swallow…it can be hard for educators to swallow too.
A second way of looking at the game, some call it
“moneyball”, is to strictly look at the game through a numbers lens. Advocates
of “moneyball” constantly look at data to make decisions. They do not base
their decisions on their own experiences or gut feelings, but instead use
numerical data trends to determine which players to use and when. True disciples of this philosophy trust
statistics rather than instincts to make decisions. Sometimes these decisions go against
traditional baseball moves (“the book”) and therefore many hardcore baseball
people find them difficult to depend on.
Many would argue this approach has depersonalized the game and taken
away the human side of decision making. Schools face the same dilemma. Teachers
and Administrators are faced with an enormous amount of data and are
asked/forced to make decisions in their classrooms and schools based on numbers
rather than relationships. Sometimes the data forces us to admit that decisions
and beliefs we have appear to be less effective than we would like to admit.
Thus a struggle between the two philosophies exists. In
fact, it has torn apart organizations that trust one version over another and
can’t seem to find a way to reconcile the two.
The truth is, the most successful baseball teams and the most successful
classrooms must use both!! We can’t
forget about “playing by the book” because we are teaching kids, not robots.
People bring variables that numbers just can’t predict. However, gone are the days when numbers don’t
matter. It would be foolish for a
baseball manager or an educator to not access the data that is available to
them to help them make the best decisions
for their students. The best and most
successful baseball managers and teachers are the ones that can balance the
humans as well as the numbers.
I encourage educators everywhere….use your instincts and
experience to make great teaching decisions, but don’t ignore the trends and
results in your data. We all owe ALL our
students that….