Over the last ten years, I am not sure if there has been a
more well-intended, but poorly implemented educational practice than
Professional Learning Communities (PLCs).
PLCs are wonderful and they are not unique to education. Collaboration, team building, debate, and
discussion are all part of healthy parts of any successful organizations. They
provide a platform for innovation and continuous improvement. Entire industries have been built on the
simple concept of putting a group of well meaning adults in a room and
expecting them to somehow collectively improve not only their individual performance
but those of the entire group.
So what is the problem?
One of the biggest mistakes we make is isolating ourselves from people
who disagree with us. We often don’t invite the “skunk” into the room. Too many times, especially in education we
are too cordial. We view “debate and
discussion” and an argument or even worse personal disrespect. Without healthy
debate, however, your PLC will never be as effective as it could be. When
discussing ideas, innovation, or even student work if there is not a “skunk” in
the group that will be the voice of dissent or at the very least offer a
different perspective your PLC will never move past compliance level.
Next time you are working with a team or group look around
and listen. Is there a person on the
team willing to stick their neck out and challenge the status quo? Excitement
and learning occur when we decide to create the future we need, not simply
defend what we already have. Unless your
team is willing to stay ahead of the curve, you will fall behind. Allow the skunk in the room….they are not
always right, but they are not always wrong either.
I think that the desire for consensus is the natural inclination.
ReplyDeleteSome PLC's are approached in a presentation style as opposed to a collaborative approach. The desire to not allow the skunk is a side effect of the approach to a PLC, from the facilitator as well as the participant. We must see these as collaborative discussions looking for an answers as opposed to presentations looking for approval.
This is similar to the classroom. As teachers, we want our students to engage in rich dialogue and challenge each others' thinking with questions. We need to carry this process to our own PLC time!!
ReplyDeleteThe skunk = cognitive dissonance. That's where the great change occurs!
ReplyDeleteYes- cognitive dissonance! I'm currently reading Results Coaching, and ran upon this in reference to cognitive shift: "...break away from the norm, be creative, use imagination, initiate something new, act in new ways". For insights that come from fields other than education, you've got to check out "Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard" by Dan and Chip Heath. Very short and easy read, phenomenal model for facilitating long-term changes.
ReplyDelete